FEATURE: Jeffrey Silberman on how Savage baits Jewish liberals[I received the following email and the referenced soundclips in a communication subsequent to being served with the TRN lawsuit. The letter, according to Jeffrey, was sent out prior to the airing of Savage's first broadcast on MSNBC. I've added this to the web site, and featured it on the home page, as Jeffrey has done an excellent job of documenting his positions. The associated sound clips are included under the terms of "fair use" for the purpose of educating the public on the topic of how Savage baits Jewish liberals and because they are already public record and widely distributed (as the letter evidences). --Ed., 6/1/03]
Neal Shapiro
Erik Sorenson Re: Michael Savage’s pattern of baiting Jewish celebrities and Jewish politicians Gentlemen, Since announcing MSNBC's decision to hire Michael Savage, MSNBC undoubtedly has received hundreds of e-mails appealing to its corporate conscience. That it does not have one is clear enough by its decision to hire Savage in the first place. You are, however, businessmen; accordingly, you would do well to consider the following in your determination whether Savage is more a public relations liability than an economic asset. I refer to MSNBC's statement that "the addition of Michael Savage to the MSNBC lineup was made with the full awareness of his reputation for controversy and confrontation. We respect the right of those who wish to protest. However, we also strongly defend his new show as a legitimate attempt to expand the marketplace of ideas. By bringing our viewers a wide range of strong, opinionated voices, MSNBC underscores its commitment to ensuring that its perspective programming promotes no one single point of view. We encourage debate and we would neither expect, nor want, our audience to agree with everything on our channel." MSNBC has "full awareness of his reputation for controversy and confrontation." And yet Cathy Renna of GLAAD reports in the press "we are also troubled by MSNBC's response when we approached them with our concerns. Despite being presented with evidence of Savage's mean-spirited and divisive ramblings, MSNBC officials have urged us simply to 'watch the show' and claims that it should not be 'associated with' comments made by Savage up until now." In addition, I read where Steve Rendall of FAIR is likewise disturbed by the message from MSNBC that "they can't be held responsible for what he has said in the past.... Isn't that why they hired [Mr. Savage]? It is what he said in the past that is getting him in the door." In light of these remarks, I have to conclude that MSNBC had no prior knowledge of any of the following racial and ethnic slurs at the time it engaged Michael Savage:
1. Commenting on Dustin Hoffman's recent Grammy appearance, Savage wondered if Hoffman had matzah in his mouth as he spoke. Later, Savage wondered if it was not corned-beef. I am not unmindful that Savage is Jewish. However, Savage goes to great lengths to keep his audience ignorant of that fact. On three separate occasions, Savage omitted references to his given name, Weiner, and his Jewish ethnicity from a nearly verbatim over-the-air reading of print articles about him, which reported these facts. I have sound clips to substantiate these omissions in case Savage denies it. Moreover, notice Savage's peculiar response when confronted with an allegation of anti-Semitism during an appearance on "Hannity and Colmes": COLMES: I have a concern about some things I have read about you and have heard tapes of you say-Savage did not explain his offensive remarks except to insist that there is "no greater supporter of Israel and the Jewish people than the man you are looking at" and to make the rather odd assertion that he would have "qualified for admission to Auschwitz." That is not an explanation; it is an evasion. Many people unfortunately qualified for admission to Auschwitz who were not Jewish. I am indifferent to the fact that Savage is Jewish because his racial slurs may have an anti-Semitic EFFECT upon those who are unaware of that fact due in no small part to his attempts to conceal it. But "he's an entertainer," so says Jack Swanson, operations director at KSFO (Savage’s home station), "people want to be entertained." Can Savage's racial insinuations be dismissed as entertainment? Listen, for instance, to clip #6 in which Savage mocks with an ethnic inflection the Jewish-sounding names of the civil rights lawyers. I detect no humor in his voice- none at all. I hear outright scorn. Whatever his motivation, Savage's ethnic and racial baiting of Jewish lawyers, Jewish celebrities, and Jewish politicians is utterly indefensible in this or ANY context. Admittedly, Savage does not have a bone to pick with all Jews- just the liberal ones. (See, e.g., http://www.newsmax.com/articles/?=2000/6/5/183729). He underscores repeatedly his contempt for liberal Jews undermining the noble efforts of our conservative Christian President who would "save" them from Al Queda terrorists: "For some reason the Islamo-faschists have said that we are going to kill all the Jews on the planet- not just Israelis- not just Zionists- not just Israelis living in the West Bank but Jews worldwide have now been targeted by the Islamo-faschist movement. Yet the Hollywood liberals many of whom- I MUST TELL YOU- are originally of the JEWISH faith or of JEWISH descent still don't get it. They're still trying to stop this good Christian President who would save them. This proves beyond a reasonable doubt that they are functionally insane." (12-10-02 broadcast) "By the evidence that I see I believe these people are functionally insane. I'll repeat why over and over again until you finally get it. This is not dissent. When a GOODLY portion of the liberals in Hollywood are of JEWISH descent- I HAVE TO SAY IT as painful and sensitive as it is- and you've got an Islamo-faschist movement saying we are going to kill Jews everywhere, and you have a good, honest Christian conservative President who has the guts to risk his political career to fight against this tide of evil, they should be backing him, but because they're so vehemently anti-Republican, they are blinded to their own survival. And so therefore I say they are functionally insane.... And I speak directly from the heart and mind; I am warning you that you are feeding the enemies that would cast you into an oven of hell. How dare you do that. How dare you speak against a man who would defend you, a man who would save you from the Islamo-faschists. Look deeply into what you are doing, I would say to each and every one of you, and you will find that you are not fighting for you own survival; you are, in fact, fighting against your own survival. Therefore, you may be functionally insane which would explain the orgiastic sex that you can't control, which would explain the addiction to drugs, which would explain the self-destructive behavior despite all the benefits that fate has afforded you; you are functionally insane...." (12-10-02 broadcast) "and here my little friends, is the subject that breaks my heart that I HAVE TO TELL you. So many liberals in that list of 100 shameful actors and actresses are of the JEWISH faith or of JEWISH parentage or of JEWISH descent. SO MANY of them. SO MANY of them. Al Queda says we'll kill Jews worldwide; Al Queda says we'll kill Christians worldwide and yet marching with the Hollywood morons are people of JEWISH descent. It proves beyond a reasonable doubt to me that they are functionally insane, caring not a whit about their survival or the survival of their country." (12-11-02 broadcast)Why does Savage "have to tell" his largely Christian audience that "so many" of the "Hollywood liberals" are Jews? Why "must" Savage single-out the Jews among the "Hollywood liberals"? This exchange occurred between Savage and a telephone caller, Kathy: SAVAGE: "Kathy in New York City, you're up on the Savage Nation. Topic please." Why would Savage be so reckless as to biblically scapegoat "apostate Jews" before a predominantly Christian audience? Al Queda has threatened not only Jews but all infidels including Christians, yet, for reasons of his own, Savage singles out Jews for vilification. Were his finger pointing confined to a synagogue, I would not question his motivation, but when he points the finger at Jews- liberal or otherwise- in the presence of Christians, I DO question it. Consider clip #7 in which Savage makes the reprehensible accusation that liberal Jews "have more hatred for Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell than they do for Osama Bin Laden." Inadvertently or not, Savage is fanning long smoldering anti-Semitic prejudices. Apparently, the Anti-Defamation League has sent letters to Savage expressing the same concern. Savage's response? The ADL can "flush them." Clip #8. It behooves MSNBC to inquire just what was the nature of those complaints. Savage should know better than to mix religion with politics- a volatile mix as history proves. Instead of assiduously dispelling any notion that ethnicity plays a part in his gripe against liberal Jews, Savage reinforces it by infusing a religious and racial undertone to his self-defined political stereotype he calls the "Red Diaper Doper Baby": "Today you have a whole legion of mentally ill RED DIAPER DOPER BABIES in the courts, in academia, and in Hollywood. So what's an RDDB? Savage defined it. Red diaper baby well-defined before I came along. Kids growing up in communist-Marxist households where Trotsky, Lenin, Stalin and the others were glorified. Sent to communist schools such as a little red schoolhouse, sent to camps in the Poconos to be good little commie brats. Well-known RDB. But then came the sixties, marijuana was introduced into the commie brain. And that did it. That was the final trigger that destroyed any semblance of balance..... If you see a women with buck teeth who used to be head of the ACLU's legal department who was put onto the Supreme Court, that's an RDDB." (12-11-02 broadcast) "Yeah, I know the whole liberal racket. I know it very well. Which is: I'm offended; you offend me; you insulted me; I'm offended; I'm a victim; you offend me; you can't put me on the defensive because you offend me. You offend me by your anti-Americanism; you offend me by your anti-Christianity; you offend me by your anti-Americanism; you offend me by your anti-family-ism. I can go down the list. So I know the racket. They all learned it from the NYU BOYS, the RED DIAPER DOPER BABIES taught them the racket...." (12-23-02 broadcast) "Do you remember what happened in the 2000 election when the Democrats sent busloads of New York lawyers to steal the election for Al Gore? Remember what happened? Do you remember the scenes of the young men in white shirts and ties mainly Cubans. Do you remember them running into that office and pounding on the glass? Do you remember how they scared them to death, and all of the CURLY-HAIRED BOYS FROM NYU hid under the desks when they were trying to cook the votes and steal the ballots?" (12-24-02 broadcast) "I watched them in Florida; they pulled out the big guns and believe me they beat the BOYS FROM NYU into a pulp. They flew down busloads full of NYU RED DIAPER DOPER BABY lawyers to get Goreleoni to win. But then the Republicans called out the high-powered W.A.S.Py lawyers- guys I haven't seen for years- you know they look like they were on dollar bills- let me put it to you that way. They guys they called out looked like they could pose for dollar bills; you know, 50's 100's- the W.A.S.P. establishment, and I love these guys; I mean they built a great country; it's a great nation. I don't like little GUYS FROM NYU WITH BIG GLASSES. I don't want them on my 50 dollar bill." (12-10-02 broadcast)The "W.A.S.P." establishment vs. "curly-haired" "NYU" Red Diaper Doper Babies.... Get the picture? Clip #9 should help clarify it. Be advised that I have, in recent days, provided these sound clips and others like them to GLAAD, FAIR, the American Jewish Committee, and the Anti-Defamation League. In addition, I have contacted the offices of Senator Schumer, Senator Lieberman, and Mr. Jerry Springer to apprise them of the racial slurs being made against them. I will continue to disseminate these sound clips to every news organization or group that demonstrates a news gathering interest in reporting about Michael Savage's gratuitous ethnic and racial baiting of Jewish celebrities and Jewish politicians. I am hereby putting MSNBC on notice that I have many additional sound clips in which Savage baits Jews by his gratuitous remarks about how they look, what they eat, how they talk, where they live, or how they were raised. The ones attached hereto are merely the tip of the iceberg. I do not expect you to take my word for it, nor would I want you to. I would be happy to provide MSNBC all of them in order to fulfill its obligation of due diligence. Do not insult my intelligence, however, by replying "we encourage debate and we would neither expect, nor want, our audience to agree with everything on our channel." My complaint goes well beyond "one man's opinion" as Savage would have it. When Savage's unmistakable pattern of Jew-baiting is ultimately disclosed, there will be no plausible deniability on the part of MSNBC that it had no prior knowledge. Sincerely yours,
Jeffrey Silberman
|
|||||||
|
|||||||